Introduction

1841


Four years into Queen Victoria’s reign and change was afoot. While the new prime minister, Robert Peel, was having to deal with working class discontent, visitor numbers to Madame Tussaud’s waxworks soared and Thomas Cook arranged his first excursion.


The 1841 census was the first census useful to family historians. Four censuses, commencing in 1801, had been carried out earlier, but they were little more than head counts.


With the foundation of the General Register Office in 1836 to register births, marriages and deaths, the government had a ready-made infrastructure to collect more information.


A form known as a ‘schedule’ was delivered to all households in Britain by enumerators, who, after they were completed, copied the information into their enumeration books.


Details included in the 1841 books are the names of those who lived in each property, their ages (to the nearest five years), their occupation and whether they were born in the same county as their residence.


Employment

The 1841 Census was the first to enable us to study individuals in detail, and draw reasonably reliable conclusions about the population as a whole.

‘Reasonably’ because those responsible for this Census were unsystematic in compiling occupational data, and were themselves astonished at the diversity of job titles (over 3,000) they collected.

From a 21st-century perspective, it’s astonishing how different the economy was. In Westminster, a staggering 17 per cent of the population were domestic servants. Indeed, across Britain as a whole, more people worked as servants than in any other sector of the economy, except agriculture. The 1.25 million domestic servants and 1.5 million farm workers dwarfed the next largest occupational category, the textiles industry, which employed some 883,000.

A further 558,000 were employed in clothing and shoe manufacture. A majority of the population still lived in rural areas, though the balance was shifting steadily towards the towns. However, you could not draw a firm line between agricultural and rural areas.

Even Manchester borough boasted 18 pig dealers and 130 farmers. But there were solid manufacturing towns. In Blackburn, 75 per cent of all workers were employed in manufacturing and in Paisley 62 per cent.

Echoing the Third World today, a massive 45 per cent of Britain’s population were under 20 (less than 7 per cent were over 60). A society so youthful could not afford for children to be economically inactive. The Census was erratic in recording child labour, but at least a third of under-15s worked full-time. Children as young as three were put to tedious, repetitive jobs like bird-scaring and stone-picking.

In Britain’s coalmines, 5,000 boys and girls aged five to 10 worked underground. Most were ‘trappers’, opening and closing ventilation doors with just a cheap candle for company through a 10 or 12-hour shift.

By contrast, the working week for the 100,000 child factory workers (all over nine) was limited to 48 hours. Male factory workers typically worked a 69-hour, six-day week.

One pound a week was a typical wage for a skilled man like a tailor (equivalent to £65 at present-day purchasing prices). Coalminers and adult male factory workers could expect to earn five shillings (25p) more.

Blogs

Life on foot

Alan Crosby considers the central role that walking played in the lives of many of our ancestors

Comments

Sarah Jessica Parker launches the US series

While the first episode could have squeezed more genealogy out of its hour-long slot, if it encourages people to start uncovering their own family history it will have fulfilled its purpose, says Kimberly Powell

Comments

Dramatic architecture

Alan Crosby pays a visit to Leeds' Grand Theatre, and lifts the curtain on what such buildings can reveal about the cultural lives of our ancestors

Comments
chevronMore about BBC Worldwide.